Chief Simon Mactavish Of Dunardry

[migovie]

simon mactavish of dunardry and his heir william mactavish declared "of dunardry" by 6th duke of argylle
are involved in some important paper work early 1800s.Simon and son william sign a pledge of "feudal" obediance to duke af argylle ...the same pledge signed by lachlan and his fathers. what is distinct and unquestionable is the fact both simon and son william sign docs on "behalf" of ALL Mactavish....both simon and his heir william are asked to sign "on behalf of clan mactavish" ....and as "head of clan mactavish"
well well...yet another paper that proves without any doubt

1...simon felt he was a chief

2...simon was treated as a chief by duke argylle

3....there was NO doubt simon and son WERE chief....as NO mactavish would be asked to sign such a pledge on behalf of all mactavish if they were not head of the clan....such docs of pledge could ONLY be signed by the head of the name mactavish.....( forget about lyons being involved at this point ....just as you would if mactavish had never at any time bothered to go to lyons....would that forever prove we hadnt a chief.??/NO....just means lyons werent asked to stamp their approval on it....simonn was chief....docs prove he was . and he wanted to be,,, and he was accepted as such...these were the same demands asked of edward dugald ....so same will apply for simon....

###....perhaps simon was assuming the role of chief without acceptance from lachlans family or scots heirachy >>?

##..impossible as we have NO reason to doubt the intelligence ,power, nor accuracy of the 6th duke of argylle in such matters.....he would NEVER prepare a doc to be signed by the "head" family of mactavish and then accept that signed by ANYONE other than the head..

##.....for lyons to accept such an error took place they would have to then label the 6th duke argylle as incompetant and foolhardy.....and there is NO way lyons will support that idea....
SO LYONS HAVE TO ACCEPT THE FACT WITHOUT ANY DOUBT THAT THE 6TH DUKE ARGYLLE ASKED SIMON AND SON TO SIGN DOCS ON BEHALF OF ALL MACTAVISH AND AS CHIEF OF DUNARDRY....AND SUCH DOC CONFIRMS SIMON AND SON WILLIAM WERE CHIEF OF MACTAVISH.....

LYONS ONLY OTHER OPTION IS TO FOREVER DOCUMENT THE 6TH DUKE OF ARGYLLE AS "INCOMPETANT AND FOOLHARDY "......I HAVE NO REASON TO SUGGEST SUCH ERROR....AND NEITHER COULD LYONS....

SO ................SIMON MACTAVISH AND SON WILLIAM WERE ACCEPTED AS "CHIEF OF MACTAVISH" BY THE 6TH DUKE OF ARGYLLE AND AS SUCH WERE DEMANDED TO SIGN PAPERS OF "FEU" RE DUNARDRY ON BEHALF OF ALL AND EVERY MACTAVISH......

LET THE COURT CASE BEGIN YOUR HONOUR.........
I DOUBT LYONS WILL EVER ,,,,EVER ,,,,DECLARE THE 6TH DUKE OF ARGYLLE AN IDIOT...AND NEITHER WOULD I.....................SO LETS MOVE AHEAD WITH THE FACT THAT 6TH DUKE OF ARGYLLE DESCRIBES SIMON AND SON AS "ARMIGER OF DUNARDRY" AND "KNOWN NOW WITHOUT QUESTION AS ARMIGER OF DUNARDRY"

[migovie]

to explain the importance of these docs it should be noted that simon and son william pledged in detail a loyalty to duke of argylle...a payment of crop levies ...an implied loyalty of ALL such feu agreements of military support to argylle ,
NOW....simon and son pledged ALL such support and IF they werent chief OR head of the clan do you see the probs that have been created by this pledge.?
It would mean now that any mactavish would be bound to fight for argylle at any demand....for simon to have signed this it would WITHOUT doubt command any dunardry mactavish to obey simons pledge as "head of dunardry":
IF simon wasnt accepted as head of clan mactavish then the duke of argylle signed with the "seal of scotland " a worthless document ....
IF simon wasnt chief then the family of lachlan would refuse to obey such contract signed...and IF lachlans family still held power as chief then THEY would have without doubt or question laid denial or refusal or exception to the very doc signed on behalf of mactavish clan by simon.....
LACHLANS HEIR SHERRIF DUGALD LAY SILENT IN THE MIDST OF THIS DOC AND ITS HISTORICAL IMPORTANCE .....
perhaps he wasnt aware of it /???????????????????
NO .....SHERRIF DUGALD WORKED IN THE LAW FIRM AS AN APPRENTICE TO TO THE MAN THAT PREPARED THE DOCUMENT................
NO QUESTION...........NO PROBLEM..................SIMON MACTAVISH AND SON WILLIAM SIGNED DOCS ON BEHALF OF CLAN MACTAVISH PREPARED BY THE FAMILY LAWYER OF LACHLAN WHILST LACHLANS SON AND HEIR WORKED AS AN APPRENTICE TO THAT VERY MAN AT THAT VERY TIME.....

>>>>>>>>>......THIS PROVES THE POWER OF AUTHORITY GIVEN AND PASSED TO SIMON MACTAVISH

[migovie]

WAS SIMON ACCEPTED AS CHIEF.????
YEP..............
TO DENY THIS WILL REQUIRE LYONS TO HISTORICALLY AND FOREVER DECLARE AS INCOMPETANT AND IDIOTS

1...THE 6TH DUKE OF ARGYLLE

2...LACHLAN MACTAVISH FAMILY LAWYER JS FERRIER (AND THUS THE LAW FIRM OF FERRIER AND SONS)

3...LACHLANS SON AND HEIR WHO WORKED AS APPRENTICE TO FERRIER AT TIME THE DOCS SIGNED

THE CALIBRE OF THE 3 PERSONS INVOLVED IN THESE DOCS AND THE UNDISPUTED FAMILY TIE TO LACHLAN AND HIS HEIR DUGALD PROVE WITHOUT DOUBT THAT THE 3 PARTIES INVOLVED IN THE "DECLARATION" THAT SIMON MACTAVISH AND SON WILLIAM WERE "NOW KNOWN AND TO BE TITLED WITH THE ARMS OF DUNARDRY " IS FACT ....WITHOUT ANY DOUBT... FACT.......

I LOOK FRWD TO POSSIBLITY OF LYONS DECLARING ARGYLLE AS WRONG....
THEN DECLARING LACHLANS FAMILY LAWYER AS ....WRONG
THEN DECLARING LACHLANS HEIR AS ....WRONG.....
LYONS WILL NEVER LABEL THESE PARTIES AS WRONG...LYONS WILL NEVER DISREGARD DOCS SIGNED BY 6TH DUKE OF ARGYLL...LYONS WILL ACCEPT THESE PAPERS AS PROOF TO THE FACT SIMON MACTAVISH AND SONS WERE TREATED, ACCEPETED AND ACTED AS CHIEF OR "HEAD" OF MACTAVISH CLAN ..

WHAT IS FACT IS THE DUNARDRY RIGHTS TO THE MACTAVISH CHIEFSHIP CEASED IN 1797 THEN THE MACTAVISH CHIEFSHIP LAY DORMANT AND UNCLAIMED SINCE SIMON MACTAVISH LAST SONS DEATH IN 1828...............

BRING IT ON.........