migovie
04-02-2004, 06:21 AM
i would appreciate any/all comments on the life of Simon Mactavish. I have become quite concerned by some of the "facts " listed regarding the life of Simon Mactavish.
I noted with interest an article displayed on the clan Mactavish website entitled ..." the true known truths ".... this particular article stated clearly that the author felt Simon Mactavish had recieved his titles through "pedigree manipulation" and "a long purse"..and perhaps that he "bribed lord lyons office"....and many other derogatory comments regarding this great man.
I took exception to this for many reasons but the foremost being .. SIMON MACTAVISH IS THE MOST FAMOUS AND SUCCESSFUL MACTAVISH TO EVER LIVE TO DATE.......why then does the Mactavish website slam him so much ???? Should not he be revered as our clans greatest achievement ????
I sent the article " true known truths " to Lord Lyons Office for their comment regarding the suggestion that titles that confirmed ancestory could be bought or Lord lyons office accepted a bribe or was somehow manipulated etc....as stated in this article
their reply was clear and concise dated 10th April 2003......
all the suggestions that simon bribed or "purchased" titles were false and the author of the article or people displaying this article "the true known truths " needed to be very careful.....and i quote...... from Lord lyons reply 10th april 2003..( the person mentioned "john hooke campbell" is the person who made the decision on the applications in 1793 and 1794 .... "lord Lyon...John Hooke Campbell" )..
lyons office wrote,......
"I am sure John Hooke Campbell of Bangeston would be well versed in Campbell history, being a descendant of the Campbells of Cawdor, and would have been the first to object if Arms had been granted that were not appropriate.
I can confirm that Amoral Bearings are on record in the public register of all arms and bearings in Scotland for Lachlan Mactavish of Dunardry and Simon Mactavish of Gartbeg. Lachlan mactavish is not described as Mactavish of Mactavish and Dunardry, and no mention is made theirin of him being a chief. Indeed, until relatively recently, I do not think the Mactavishes were regarded as a distinct clan with their own head.
The very name Mactavish means son of Tavish, and it is, i am quite sure for that reason that in 1793 the Campbell quarter was given to show the then accepted descent of Mactavish of Dunardry from the greater clan Campbell. Indeed the most recent work on the history of clan Campbell continues to support the theory that the most likely candidate for the ancestor of the Mactavishes is the person I mention above (Taius Coir...illegitmate son of Colin Maol Math, chief of clan Campbell). No evidence has been forthcoming in recent times to give any other possible ancestory"......
It would appear clearly obvious that Lord Lyons Office still accept the grounds of both Lachlan and Simons application for arms showing the Mactavish ties to clan Campbell as being historically correct....my immediate feeling is if my forefathers lived and died believing this matter to be true then I would be showing extreme disrespect to them by turning my back on their beliefs. I respect them enough to respect their beliefs ....they were men of integrity and passion and the least I can do to continue these Mactavish traits is to continue their passion.....they are my blood ....they are my passion......there is no possible way I could disrespect them by turning my back on what they believed to be true. I have crests and legend that confirm a close Campbell connection. I would require some extremely convincing evidence to alter my opinion , and even then I would continue to acknowledge and respect my ancestors beliefs.
Lets all now look at the great life and success of Simon Mactavish of Garthbeg with its due pride....HE IS A FAMOUS AND SUCCESSFUL MACTAVISH.......(still unsurpassed)
It may be simpler than it all seems as we know Lachlan Mctavish arms grant in 1793 makes no mention of him being a chief....so perhaps this recent new Mactavish arms grant is simply just that......a new grant that obviously completely divorces itself from all its ancestors long held beliefs and legends....but this would be a VERY unScottish thing to do as everyone knows Scotland has lived and breathed legend and belief since its birth. Would not this recent separation from Lachlan and Simons beliefs now show separation from everything these 2 men believed in?
I noted with interest an article displayed on the clan Mactavish website entitled ..." the true known truths ".... this particular article stated clearly that the author felt Simon Mactavish had recieved his titles through "pedigree manipulation" and "a long purse"..and perhaps that he "bribed lord lyons office"....and many other derogatory comments regarding this great man.
I took exception to this for many reasons but the foremost being .. SIMON MACTAVISH IS THE MOST FAMOUS AND SUCCESSFUL MACTAVISH TO EVER LIVE TO DATE.......why then does the Mactavish website slam him so much ???? Should not he be revered as our clans greatest achievement ????
I sent the article " true known truths " to Lord Lyons Office for their comment regarding the suggestion that titles that confirmed ancestory could be bought or Lord lyons office accepted a bribe or was somehow manipulated etc....as stated in this article
their reply was clear and concise dated 10th April 2003......
all the suggestions that simon bribed or "purchased" titles were false and the author of the article or people displaying this article "the true known truths " needed to be very careful.....and i quote...... from Lord lyons reply 10th april 2003..( the person mentioned "john hooke campbell" is the person who made the decision on the applications in 1793 and 1794 .... "lord Lyon...John Hooke Campbell" )..
lyons office wrote,......
"I am sure John Hooke Campbell of Bangeston would be well versed in Campbell history, being a descendant of the Campbells of Cawdor, and would have been the first to object if Arms had been granted that were not appropriate.
I can confirm that Amoral Bearings are on record in the public register of all arms and bearings in Scotland for Lachlan Mactavish of Dunardry and Simon Mactavish of Gartbeg. Lachlan mactavish is not described as Mactavish of Mactavish and Dunardry, and no mention is made theirin of him being a chief. Indeed, until relatively recently, I do not think the Mactavishes were regarded as a distinct clan with their own head.
The very name Mactavish means son of Tavish, and it is, i am quite sure for that reason that in 1793 the Campbell quarter was given to show the then accepted descent of Mactavish of Dunardry from the greater clan Campbell. Indeed the most recent work on the history of clan Campbell continues to support the theory that the most likely candidate for the ancestor of the Mactavishes is the person I mention above (Taius Coir...illegitmate son of Colin Maol Math, chief of clan Campbell). No evidence has been forthcoming in recent times to give any other possible ancestory"......
It would appear clearly obvious that Lord Lyons Office still accept the grounds of both Lachlan and Simons application for arms showing the Mactavish ties to clan Campbell as being historically correct....my immediate feeling is if my forefathers lived and died believing this matter to be true then I would be showing extreme disrespect to them by turning my back on their beliefs. I respect them enough to respect their beliefs ....they were men of integrity and passion and the least I can do to continue these Mactavish traits is to continue their passion.....they are my blood ....they are my passion......there is no possible way I could disrespect them by turning my back on what they believed to be true. I have crests and legend that confirm a close Campbell connection. I would require some extremely convincing evidence to alter my opinion , and even then I would continue to acknowledge and respect my ancestors beliefs.
Lets all now look at the great life and success of Simon Mactavish of Garthbeg with its due pride....HE IS A FAMOUS AND SUCCESSFUL MACTAVISH.......(still unsurpassed)
It may be simpler than it all seems as we know Lachlan Mctavish arms grant in 1793 makes no mention of him being a chief....so perhaps this recent new Mactavish arms grant is simply just that......a new grant that obviously completely divorces itself from all its ancestors long held beliefs and legends....but this would be a VERY unScottish thing to do as everyone knows Scotland has lived and breathed legend and belief since its birth. Would not this recent separation from Lachlan and Simons beliefs now show separation from everything these 2 men believed in?